Editor responding to letter in the paper
Mar. 13th, 2003 08:38 amNormally, the San Francisco Chronicle doesn't respond to their letters to the editor. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen them do it before. But this one got a response. Sadly, the author is echoing what I've heard from many different people. I'm constantly floored by the degree of ignorance in this country, especially among the hardcore Bush supporters. I know it's bad form to accuse those who disagree with you of willful ignorance, but really, what else could account for these people's opinions?
We impeached our last president because he lied about a blow job. This one, we've caught lying, multiple times, about reasons for going to war, but a lot of people still continue to support it. Even after he admits his lies, changes his stories (and then, inevitably, starts repeating them again). This is just amazing, and frankly I can't see how it could be anything other than deliberate ignoring the facts to justify one's own hatred and bloodlust?
Anyway, the original letter and response can be found here. I'm glad that the Chronicle reversed its usual policy of not responding to letters to point out to this guy that he's not quite as informed as he thinks, despite listening to news "constantly".
( The letter )
( And the Chronicle's response )
We impeached our last president because he lied about a blow job. This one, we've caught lying, multiple times, about reasons for going to war, but a lot of people still continue to support it. Even after he admits his lies, changes his stories (and then, inevitably, starts repeating them again). This is just amazing, and frankly I can't see how it could be anything other than deliberate ignoring the facts to justify one's own hatred and bloodlust?
Anyway, the original letter and response can be found here. I'm glad that the Chronicle reversed its usual policy of not responding to letters to point out to this guy that he's not quite as informed as he thinks, despite listening to news "constantly".
( The letter )
( And the Chronicle's response )