Speaking of WMDs in Iraq...

[plutherus]

Yeah, speaking of which. There are, really, only two possibilities:
1. Bush was lying, and the inspectors were all telling the truth, that Saddam didn't have any. Or:
2. He had them, and was so incredibly principled and against their use that he refused to use them even when facing inevitable defeat and death or capture at the hands of his hated enemy.

Based on what little I know of the character and past actions of Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush, I'm not leanin' toward option #2 here.

Comments

[freydis.livejournal.com]

preach it, brutha..

[http://users.livejournal.com/_heretic/]

I was thinking the other day about all of the "liberal bias and untruths" that the administration and bobbleheads were attacking reasonable rationale in the past. Wait it's still happening...
Wouldn't it be fun, if it doesn't already exist, to have a web page where people have made statements based on data present at the time, where they were attcked for those statements, and where now the administration is admitting their blunder or changing their tune.
Anything like that out there?

[docscarabus.livejournal.com]

You left out the "official" version: that he didn't have them, but that all the intelligence indicated that he did.

Whats this about the "inspectors?" Scott Ritter was the only inspector who stood up and said that there were no weapons. Hans Blix just sat on his hands.